[Lecture Summary] 03 Real Anaysis : Sequence
This contents is based on Lecture of 18.100A of MIT Open Course. Coverage will be Lecture from 4~. link
Overview
Analysis is the study of limits
Definition and Symbols
Sequence of Reals
- function $x: \mathbb{N}\to\mathbb{R}$
- $x(n)=x_n$
- $\lbrace x_n \rbrace_{n=1}^{\infty}, \lbrace x_n\rbrace$
Bounded
- sequence is bounded if $\exists B\ge 0 s.t. \forall n, \lvert x_n\rvert\le B$
- to prove that a sequence is unbounded, then derive other values which is less than any value of sequence
Convergence
- if $\forall \epsilon >0, \exists M\in \mathbb{N} s.t. \forall n\ge M \lvert x_n - x \rvert < \epsilon$
- As a sequence progress, sequence and convergent value are getting closer!
Limits
- $x=\lim_{n \to \infty}x_n$ or $x_n\to x$
Monotone increasing(decreasing): monotonic
- $\forall n\in \mathbb{N}, x_n \le(\ge) x_{n+1}$
Subsequence
- sequence with entries coming from another given sequence.
- $x_n$ be a parent sequence and $n_k$ is strictly increasing sequence of $\mathbb{N}$. Then the subsequence is $\lbrace x_{n_{k}}\rbrace_{k=1}^{\infty}$
Limsup(limit superior)/Liminf(limit inferior)
- For bounded sequence $x_n$
- $\limsup x_n = \lim (\sup\lbrace x_k \mid k\ge n\rbrace)$
- $\liminf x_n = \lim (\inf\lbrace x_k \mid k\ge n\rbrace)$
- Of course, supremum and infimum might be different with each other, they can be same for limsup and liminf(maybe convergence?!)
Cauchy
- A sequence $x_n$ is Cauchy if $\forall \epsilon >0 \exists s.t. \forall n,k\ge M, \lvert x_n-x_k\rvert<\epsilon$
- any 2 entries get closer to each other.
Not Cauchy
- A sequence $x_n$ is not Cauchy if $\exists \epsilon_0 s.t. \forall M\in\mathbb{N}, \exists n,k\ge M s.t. \lvert x_n - x_k\rvert \ge \epsilon_0$
Questions to be solved
- How do limits interact with ordering, algebric operations?
- Does a bounded sequene have a convergent subsequence?
- Motivation for $\limsup, \liminf$
Theorem
$x,y \in \mathbb{R}. \mbox{ If } \forall \epsilon > 0, \lvert x-y \rvert <\epsilon, \mbox{ then } x=y$
Approach
- Contradiction
- Suppose that $x\ne y$
- Prove that absolute value is negative!
(Uniqueness) If $\lbrace x_n\rbrace$ converges for x and y, then x=y.
Approach
- Use just the above theorem
- To do so, we need to derive $\lvert x-y \rvert <\epsilon$
- Inequality comes from the definition of convergence
If $x_n$ is convergent then $x_n$ is bounded
Let $x_n$ be a monotone increasing sequence. $x_n$ is convergent $\iff x_n$ is bounded. Also $\lim_{n\to \infty}x_n = \sup\lbrace x_n \mid n\in \mathbb{N}\rbrace$
Approach
- iff relation is proved with previous theorem.
- Definition of limit.
- Then define $x$ as the supremum of $x_n$.
Assumption
- AP and WOP of $\mathbb{R}$ to show it is bounde above and below.
Want to show
- limit of $x_n$ is $x$.
If $c\ge 1$ then $c^n$ is unbounded
Approach
- for $x\ge -1$, $\forall n\in\mathbb{N}, (1+x)^n \ge 1+nx$
Want to show
- $\forall B\ge0, \exists n\in \mathbb{N} s.t. c^n > B$
If $c\in(0,1)$, then $\lim c^n = 0$
Approach
- for $x\ge -1$, $\forall n\in\mathbb{N}, (1+x)^n \ge 1+nx$
- Induction!
Want to show
- $\forall n\in\mathbb{N}, 0<c^{n+1}<c^n$ : monotonic decreasing and bounded
- Then it converges and show that limit of it is 0!
If $x_n$ converges to $x$, then any subsequence of $x_n$ will converge to $x$ either.
(Squeeze theorem) $a_n, b_n, x_n$ are sequences s.t. $a_n \le x_n \le b_n$. Both $a_n, b_n$ converges to $x$, then $x_n$ converges to x either.
Approach
- Using definition of convergence, define the number that each sequence $a_n, b_n$ converges.
- Then choose larger value for $x_n$!
$\lim x_n = x \iff \lim \lvert x_n - x \rvert = 0$
Approach
- Use definition
- $\lvert x_n - x \rvert = \lvert \lvert x_n - x\rvert - 0\rvert$
Let $x_n, y_n$ be sequences of $\mathbb{N}$. If both sequences are convergent and $\forall n\in\mathbb{N}, x_n \le y_n$ then $\lim x_n \le \lim y_n$
Remark
- limit can lose strict inequality relation.
- limit of two sequences can be equal to each other!
Let $x_n, y_n$ be sequences of $\mathbb{N}$. If $x_n$ is convergent and $\forall n \in \mathbb{N}, a_n \le x_n \le b_n$ then $a\le \lim x_n \le b$
$x_n$ is convergent s.t. $\forall n\in \mathbb{N}, x_n\ge 0$ then $\lbrace \sqrt{x_n}\rbrace$ is convergent and $\lim \sqrt{x_n} = \sqrt{\lim x_n}$
If $x_n$ is convergent and $\lim x_n = x$ then $lim \lvert x_n\rvert = \lvert x\rvert$
Approach
- Reverse inequality
Remark
- converse statement is not true!
(Special sequences) If $p>0$ then $\lim n^{-p} = 0$
Approach
- Use definition of limit
(Special sequences) If $p>0$ then $\lim p^ = 1$
Approach
- For $x\ge -1$ then $(1+x)^n\ge 1+nx$
- p = (1+(p^1-1))^n
- Squeeze Theorem!
(Special sequences) $\lim n^ = 1$
Approach
- Binomial theorem!
- $n = (1+x_n)^n$
- $x_n = n^-1$
For bounded seuqence $x_n, a_n = \sup\lbrace x_k \mid k\ge n\rbrace, b_n = \inf\lbrace x_k \mid k\ge n\rbrace$, then $a_n$ is monotone decreasing and bounded and $b_n$ is monotone increasing and bounded
Approach
- To show that $x_n$ is bounded, AP of $\mathbb{R}$!
- To show that $a_n, b_n$ are monotonic, use definition of monotone.
- Finally, we can show that $a_n, b_n$ are bounded use $x_n$
Remark
- $a_n , b_n$ is subsequence!
For bounded seuqence $x_n, a_n = \sup\lbrace x_k \mid k\ge n\rbrace, b_n = \inf\lbrace x_k \mid k\ge n\rbrace$, then $\liminf x_n \le \limsup x_n$
Approach
- Use previous theorem
- Use definition of infimum and supremum of $x_n$ and derive inequality!
For bounded sequence $x_n$, there exists subsequences $x_{n_k}, x_{m_k} s.t. \lim x_{n_k} = \limsup x_n , \lim x_{m_k} = \liminf x_n$
Approach
- definie supremum of $x_k$.
- derive ineqaulity relation repeatedly and use Squeeze Theorem!
- We can find an element which satisfies supremum inequality relation
- Gather them! they are subsequence!
(Bolzano-Weierstrass) Every bounded sequence has a convergent subsequence!
For bounded seuqence $x_n$, $x_n$ converges $\iff \liminf x_n = \limsup x_n (=\lim x_n)$
Approach
- Sequeze theorem for converse statement
- define limsup and liminf for each and use the fact that $x_n$ is convergent!
If $x_n$ is Cauchy, then $x_n$ is bounded
Approach
- Once we define $\epsilon_0$ then we can calculate corresponding interval for Cauchy assumption and then prove that it is bounded!
If $x_n$ is Caucyand subsequence $x_{n_k}$ converges then $x_n$ converges
Approach
- Definition
- Convergence of subsequence does not guarantee that of full sequence!
- So we need to “concatenate” inequality from Cauchy assumption and subsequence convergence
A sequence of real numbers $x_n$ is Cauchy if and only if $x_n$is convergent
Remark
- If we only work in natural numbers, convergence implies Cauchy but Cauch does not imply convergence.
- For $\mathbb{R}, l.u.b.p is the reason why converges $\iff$ Cauchy
- To use BW theorem, we need to derive limit of sup and inf which says we need sup and inf literally. $\mathbb{R}$ has l.u.b.p. but $\mathbb{Q}$ does not.
- If we can derive Cauchy then we can prove convergence without calculating the exact x
댓글남기기